All education, primary, secondary school and further education, should be free to all people and paid for by the government. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
遇到不同的话题时，我们首先需要找到题目的核心矛盾，比如本题中，出现了all这样过于肯定的词汇，可以成为我们的切入点。
为什么呢？因为在实际的英文写作当中，我们需要尽可能保持客观，这样才能使我们的论述更加被信服，也更难被对方找到破绽并驳倒。所以大家在写作的过程中尽量使用一些相对比较委婉的词汇，如could，might，would等。
在本题中，各个阶段的教育都应该免费，是否真的是这样呢？大家知道在中国，我们是有九年制的免费义务教育，只需要交一些书本费就可以了。那为什么要这么做呢？很基本的原因是为了解决国内的文盲问题。在很多经济不发达相对闭塞的地区，家庭条件比较困难，如果没有这项政策的话，很难解决孩子的上学问题。
其次，大家可以思考一个问题，为什么免费政策只持续到初中了呢？除了财政经费问题，还有部分原因是小学和初中的学习，能够最低限度地保证学生具备文字书写能力，算数能力等等，可以保证大多数人能够在社会上找到一份能够养活自己的工作。所以这就是为什么免费的义务教育在国内只达到了初中。
那么高等教育，比如大学，读研读博，是否应该免费呢？这里大家可以思考一个很现实的问题：国家财力是有限的。如果每一个人都可以免费，尽情地深造，留学读研，这笔费用将非常高昂，那么财政收入用于其他地方的就所剩无几了。财政收入大部分来源是税收，政府将用这笔钱来做各种基础建设，比如我们的大兴机场，各种公路，高架桥，还需要研发新科技，研制药物，太空探索，治理环境污染等等。
那么如果在教育上有过多的偏重，会直接影响到政府解决其他和民生相关的问题。因此，这是第一个为什么高等教育无法免费的原因。
第二个原因是什么呢？大家可以思考一下，是不是每个人都适合深造，进行学术研究的呢？很显然，不是这样的。如果收费的话，大家会反思自己到底适合什么样的方式，是学习一门技能工作呢，还是去进行学术上的深造，而不会因为免费，就理所应当地去做了。这样做，还可以减少我们对教育资源，如教室，师资等不必要的浪费。
好了，刚刚和大家聊了聊思路，接下来附上大纲和范文，希望吴老师可以帮助到大家。
不同意：
1.全部由政府负责，费用过高，导致没有足够的钱来发展经济和解决人们现存的问题。
government 政府
take the responsibility of 负责...
目前存在的难以解决的问题：
global warming 全球变暖
the increase of sea level 海平面上升
habitat destruction 栖息地破坏
extreme weather 极端天气
flood 洪水
drought 干旱
environment contamination 环境污染
smog\haze 雾霾
disease 疾病
cancer 癌症
AIDS 艾滋病
2019-nCoV 2019新型冠状病毒
Ebola 埃博拉病毒
water shortage 水资源短缺
lack of resource 资源匮乏
2.教育付费给了学生反思的机会，避免教育资源的浪费。
academic knowledge vocational skills
同意：
1.教育是公平的，每个人都有接受同等教育的权利。
have the right to
2.初等教育可以免费。
elementary education could be free.
Different countries have different education systems. I don‛t know all the education systems in the world but all the ones I do know about have free school education at primary and secondary level. I certainly agree with the statement that this should be the case. I believe university education is different.
No matter what standard of income someone has or what society someone comes from, everyone should have the opportunity to have a good standard of education. This is not always what happens but it is what should happen. Private schools can be available for those who want and can afford it but the free schools should always be there. This is certainly one of the best attributes of western democracy and all countries it seems strive to attain situation although some have problems due to the economic and political situations in their countries. Governments should make sure that all their citizens have access to a good standard of free education at primary and secondary level.
Further education is different. In an ideal world this should be free but governments have a lot of demands on their money. I think that students should have to pay, maybe not all, but at least a contribution towards their tuition fees. They will be able to earn it back once they have graduated. The UK has this system whereas in the US students have to pay all their high tuition fees which can run into the tens of thousands of dollars over a full course. I am not sure if I agree with this but it certainly would make sure that students make the best of efforts to pass or all their money would be wasted.
Therefore I conclude that primary and secondary education should be freely available for all if possible but that further education should not necessarily be wholly free.
